Background An ameloblastoma is a harmless odontogenic neoplasm with aggressive behaviour
April 24, 2017
Background An ameloblastoma is a harmless odontogenic neoplasm with aggressive behaviour and high recurrence rates. polymerase chain reaction (MSP-PCR) and restriction enzyme digestion to evaluate the methylation profile of and in 12 ameloblastoma samples and 12 healthy gingiva AS-605240 fragments which were included as controls. Furthermore we investigated the transcription levels of the genes by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Zymography was performed to verify protein expression in ameloblastomas. Results The ameloblastomas showed a high frequency of unmethylated and AS-605240 were found in ameloblastomas compared to healthy gingiva. However no significant differences in the mRNA expression between groups was found. All ameloblastomas showed positive expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 proteins. Conclusions Our findings suggest that expression of is increased in ameloblastomas and is possibly modulated by unmethylation of the gene. and genes was reported in ameloblastomas by our group and others [5 9 10 but the significance AS-605240 of this data remains to be determined. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc-dependent enzymes that are important in extracellular matrix remodelling and are associated with tumour growth and invasion through collagen matrix degradation . The invasive characteristic of ameloblastomas has been associated with the expression of genes related to bone turnover and extracellular matrix remodelling; these include and its receptor and and methylation and their mRNA transcription and protein expression in ameloblastomas. Methods Patients and AS-605240 tissue samples Twelve fresh ameloblastoma specimens were collected during surgical care in the Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil. These samples comprised eleven solid-multicystic follicular ameloblastomas and one unicystic case. Diagnoses were confirmed by histopathologic analysis predicated on the Globe Health Firm classification of histological typing of odontogenic tumours . Additional medical data are demonstrated in Table ?Desk1.1. Twelve fragments of healthful gingival samples without clinical proof inflammation were gathered during third molar extractions and used as controls. The samples were obtained following informed consent and with the approval of the Ethics Committee (reference number 266/11). Table 1 Distribution of subjects according to gender age and AS-605240 anatomic site DNA isolation and methylation analysis of and software  was used to search CpG islands and sparse CG dinucleotides. Distinct methods are AS-605240 suggested to analyse methylation profiles according to the presence of CpG islands or sparse CG dinucleotides located in the promoter region or in exons near to that region . To assess the gene CpG island methylation genomic DNA was modified by sodium bisulfite as described previously  and subsequently amplified with primer sets designed to specifically recognise methylated (F 5’-GCGGTTATACGTATCGAGTTAGC-3’ and R 5’-ACTCTTTATCCGTTTTAAAAACGAC-3’; 205?bp) and unmethylated DNA (F 5’-GGTGGTTATATGTATTGAGTTAGTGA-3’ and R 5’-ACTCTTTATCCATTTTAAAAACAAC-3’ 206?bp). Bisulfite-treated unmethylated DNA from (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) cells was used as a positive control for unmethylated amplification of the gene. Methylation-induced DNA of same cells by the MSssI methylase enzyme (New England Biolabs Beverly USA) was used as positive control for methylated amplification. The methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes HhaI and AciI (New England BioLabs Beverly MA USA) were used to assess the methylation of CG dinucleotides in the promoter including the CG sites located at positions -35 -185 -223 -233 as described previously . Restriction enzymes cleave DNA at unmethylated CG sites Terlipressin Acetate but they are unable to cut methylated cytosines. Analysis using a bioinformatics web site ( http://www.restrictionmapper.org) showed that this HhaI enzyme cleaves the restriction site at position -35 and that the other sites are cleaved by AciI. The CG dinucleotides analysed in this study are located close to the transcription start of the gene. Two hundred nanograms of genomic DNA was digested separately with each of the restriction enzymes HhaI and AciI according to manufacturer’s protocol to cleave the specific regions made up of CG sites (New England BioLabs Beverly MA USA). Digestion was followed by PCR.